Pie of Knowledge Top Banner

"Maximizing the green, minimizing the blue"

Home  Home
What is the deal?
People  "What is the deal" message board 
Shopping bag  Logo Merchandise
Boxfull  Galleria!
Mickey  Daily Cartoon
Baseball Equipment  Baseball

Chain  Links
Pie  Link to the Pie
  About the Pie of Knowledge

Books  What is the Deal archive
Envelope  Submit article

Banner 10000007

Guest Columnists :
The problem with the left - Paul Greenberg, TownHall.com
The pre-emptive war goes Hollywood  - Diana West, TownHall.com
Truth and Opportunism - Dave Kopel, National Review
Trent Lott, Bill Clinton and career politicians  - Dennis Prager, TownHall.com

What is the Deal?

Do you need to buy a birthday, anniversary or holiday gift?  Visit the Galleria!

December 22, 2002

What is the deal with Title IX?

By Jan A. Larson

Title IX of the Educational Amendments Act of 1972, very simply, banned any discrimination on the basis of gender in any educational program that received Federal funding.  Seems simple enough.  Seems fair enough.

It has apparently worked too.  According to a recent USA Today article, there are nearly nine times more girls playing sports at the high school level today versus 1972 and, since the NCAA took over the administration of women’s intercollegiate athletics in 1981, participation has more than doubled.  The tremendous increase in the participation of women in high school and intercollegiate athletics eventually led the formation of women’s professional sports leagues.

The gains by women in athletics have not come without a cost.  Title IX basically requires that if a particular university has 55% of their student body made up of women, then 55% roughly plus or minus 1% of that school’s athletes must be women.  Obviously there are two ways to achieve “proportionality,” those being to add opportunities for women, the desired outcome, or cut men’s sports, the unintended consequence.

It is far easier for budget strapped administrators to cut a non-revenue producing men’s sport than it is to add expenses to the budget by fielding more women’s teams.  It is estimated that approximately 170 intercollegiate wrestling programs have been eliminated.  Other “minor” men’s sports such as gymnastics, baseball and swimming have been cut.  On the other side, schools such as Michigan and Arizona State are adding women’s rowing teams going so far as to advertise for “athletes” to come out for the sport.

Can any act, no how well intentioned, be considered successful when opportunities are lost?  What does it say when schools have to advertise for students to fill out their women’s teams?  It says to me that Title IX, for all of the benefits that have resulted since its implementation, needs to be fixed.

In June of 2002, a Commission on Opportunity in Athletics was formed to review Title IX and its implications.  It is widely expected that the Commission will recommend changes that will water down the proportionality requirements.

Of course there are strong opinions on both sides but the one that proponents of Title IX constantly bring up is the disproportionate weight that football has in the athletic departments.  They will offer that if institutions would reduce scholarships from 85 to 60 and reduces coaches’ salaries in football and basketball they would have plenty of money to fund the so-called minor sports for men.

Once again this is a shortsighted viewpoint.  Football and basketball pay the bills for the entire athletic department at most major schools.  And even more to the point, there is a huge public demand for college football and basketball.  If the “solution” to the problem involves the de-emphasis, i.e. budget cutting, of football and basketball, the golden goose will be dead and there will be plenty women joining the male gymnasts and wrestlers on the sidelines wondering just what became of their athletic opportunities.

There is no need to make major changes to Title IX.  It has served the purpose of increasing opportunities for women but it some changes are required.  It is ludicrous that male athletes lose opportunities while women's teams go begging for athletes.


Send feedback to the author.

The "What is the Deal?"column will appear from time to time on the Pie of Knowledge website.  Guest submissions are welcome and encouraged.   To submit an article to "What is the Deal?" clickhere.

To subscribe to the "What is the Deal?" mailing list and receive early notification when a new column is available, click here.  The Pie of Knowledge will never, ever divulge email addresses to any third party for any reason unless so ordered by a court of law.

Contributions to the Pie of Knowledge are greatly appreciated.
I accept payment through PayPal!, the #1 online payment service!

The opinions expressed in "What is the Deal?" guest columns reflect those of the author only and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Pie of Knowledge.  The owner and staff of the Pie of Knowledge accept no responsibility for the content or accuracy of submitted commentary.  (c) Copyright 2002 - The Pie of Knowledge (Jan A. Larson).  All rights reserved.  This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.