Pie of Knowledge Top Banner

"Maximizing the green, minimizing the blue"

Home  Home
What is the deal?
Shopping bag  Logo Merchandise
Boxfull  Galleria!
Mickey  Daily Cartoon
Baseball Equipment  Baseball

Chain  Links
Pie  Link to the Pie
  About the Pie of Knowledge

Books  What is the Deal archive
Envelope  Submit article



What is the Deal?
Archive

Gifts for all occasions in the Galleria!

The "What is the Deal?" Deal-of-the-Week:  Best sellers at The Sharper Image

March 6, 2005

A Society Gone Mad

By Jan A. Larson

If ever a case has proven that American society has gone mad, it is the case of Terry Schiavo.

Ultimately a court will decide if Terry Schiavo's feeding tube will be removed and she will endure a lingering, painful and inhumane death.  If Terry Schiavo were a young child being starved by her parents, an elderly woman neglected by her family, a prisoner at Guantanamo being denied food or even a horse that was being starved by its owner, there would be outrage from all corners.

In this case, however, that of an otherwise healthy, but brain-damaged woman, many seem to think that it is OK to let her waste away until her organs fail.

According to a FOX News poll, 59% of those polled would remove Schiavo's feeding tube.  This is absolutely shocking when one considers that this case is not a right-to-die case, at least in the classic sense.  Terry Schiavo is not on any sort of life support other than required to provide food and water, the basic necessities of life.

Would those same 59% starve their grandmothers to death if it were no longer convenient to keep her around?  Would they starve a sick child or an unwanted dog?  Maybe they would.

There is more to this case than the simple (if such a thing were simple) decision to let a brain-damaged woman die in peace.

Terry's husband, Michael Schiavo, insists that Terry wouldn't want to live in her present condition, but can produce no documentation to prove that Terry agrees.

If Michael Schiavo were truly a loving husband, only concerned with questions about his wife's quality of life, he wouldn't have fathered two children with another woman in the years since Terry mysteriously fell into a so-called persistent vegetative state.

If Michael Schiavo were truly a loving husband, he would never consider torturing his wife by starvation.

If Michael Schiavo simply wanted to move on with his life, he would divorce Terry and turn her care over to her parents, who are desperately trying to keep their daughter from meeting a gruesome end.

There is more to this case than meets the eye.  Just why does Michael Schiavo want Terry dead?  Could it be that Michael had a hand in the events that put Terry in her current state?  I don't know, but like they say, if it walks like a duck ... .  Maybe Michael Schiavo is just an inept Scott Peterson.

No matter how Terry Schiavo came to be in her present state and no matter why Michael Schiavo may want her dead, how is it possible in this day and age, that our society would ever, ever allow someone, brain-damaged or not, to die this way?

Terry's parents insist that she responds to their presence, smiles when they enter her room, cries and sometimes tries to speak.  Some "experts" dismiss these actions as reflexive and that Terry is not interacting with her surroundings.  Other experts disagree.

Murderers must be convicted "beyond a reasonable doubt" before the death penalty is imposed, and are entitled to years of appeals.  Despite plenty of doubt about Terry Schiavo's condition, Michael Schiavo is ready to strap Terry into the figurative electric chair and throw the switch, although her death would not be quite so humane.

With the recent awakening of a Kansas woman from a 20-year coma, who is to say what medical science may be able to do for Terry Schiavo in months or years to come?  No one killed Christopher Reeve when he no longer had use of his limbs.  With no evidence that Terry would want to end her life, her parents willing to assume responsibility for her care and let Michael Schiavo walk away, why must she die?

The more important question is why our government and our society would ever let it happen.


--
Subscribe to What is the Deal?
Powered by groups.yahoo.com


Send feedback to the author.


The "What is the Deal?" column will appears weekly on the Pie of Knowledge website.  Guest submissions are welcome and encouraged.   To submit an article to "What is the Deal?" click here.

To subscribe to the "What is the Deal?" mailing list and receive early notification when a new column is available, click here.  The Pie of Knowledge will never, ever divulge email addresses to any third party for any reason unless so ordered by a court of law.

Contributions to the Pie of Knowledge are greatly appreciated.
I accept payment through PayPal!, the #1 online payment service!
Visitors:



The opinions expressed in "What is the Deal?" guest columns reflect those of the author only and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Pie of Knowledge.  The owner and staff of the Pie of Knowledge accept no responsibility for the content or accuracy of submitted commentary.  (c) Copyright 2002-2005 - The Pie of Knowledge (Jan A. Larson).  All rights reserved.  This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

[Top]