Pie of Knowledge Top Banner

"Maximizing the green, minimizing the blue"

Home  Home
What is the deal?
Shopping bag  Logo Merchandise
Boxfull  Galleria!
Mickey  Daily Cartoon
Baseball Equipment  Baseball

Chain  Links
Pie  Link to the Pie
  About the Pie of Knowledge

Books  What is the Deal archive
Envelope  Submit article



What is the Deal?
Archive

Gifts for all occasions in the Galleria!

Subscribe to the "What is the Deal?" mailing list.

February 15, 2004

What is the Deal with Gay Marriage?

ringsBy Jan A. Larson

The recent Massachusetts Supreme Court ruling that declared a state law banning same-sex marriages unconstitutional has raised consciousness of all Americans to the question of whether same-sex couples should be allowed to marry.

The Massachusetts ruling grants the right of same-sex couples to marry in that state and has sparked a rush to amend the state constitution.  Any amendment would not take effect before 2006 thus opening a window for gays in the Bay State to legally marry.

There is sharp division among Americans with respect to the question of gay marriage.  Polls indicate that the majority of Americans oppose allowing gays to legally marry with a smaller percentage opposing some sort of civil unions that stop short of marriage.

Most of the opposition, I believe, stems from personal religious beliefs and from history rather than a logical analysis.  Many Americans hold deep-seated religious convictions against gay relationships.  I will defer that issue to the Deity.  Some opposition may very well be simply a result of change being frightening to some.

I must admit that it has been a very long time since I have found myself as ambivalent about an issue as I am on this one.

I cannot think of a good reason why gay couples should not be allowed to legalize their relationships if they so choose.  I also cannot think of a compelling reason gay marriages should be sanctioned by the state.

I have tried to determine a position on this issue based on how it would affect me personally.  Frankly, if a gay couple lives together in a single household, I can't imagine how it would affect me one way or the other whether or not they have a piece of paper (a marriage license).

From a financial perspective, marriage licenses cost money so each county would receive some income from license fees.  That would be a plus for me.  If gay marriage were legalized, the wedding industry and all related industries would benefit, which would, in turn, provide a boost, albeit small in the grand scheme of things, to the economy.  Another plus.

The death of one partner of a legally married gay couple would exempt the surviving partner from estate taxes so that would be a net negative from my perspective.  Of course, the President has the goal of eliminating the "death tax" so that may not be an issue.

On the issue of taxes, the income tax code still includes a "marriage penalty" although, once again, the President wishes to have this eliminated.  As long as a marriage penalty exists, gay marriages would result in higher taxes for a married couple than if each were single.  Another plus for me.

With respect to contractual obligations, two individuals may enter into contracts in much the same way as a married couple, so there doesn't appear to be any advantage or disadvantage from that perspective.

A married couple would be able to share health benefits from one partner's employer, although "domestic partner" benefits are available from some companies today.  This could have a negative effect on me if my employer's insurance costs were to rise as a result.

Another more serious consideration would be the effect on children of gay couples.  Would such a child have two "mothers" or two "fathers?"  Would such children face identity issues later in life?  I don't know, but such relationships exist today, so the issue of marriage won't necessarily change that.  It would be a stretch to say that children psychologically "damaged" (if that is the case) from growing up with same-sex parents would add a cost to me.

The bottom line is that I still can't come up with a strong argument for or against gay marriage but I wonder if the gays that are pushing for legalization have fully considered the consequences?  I suspect the biggest beneficiaries of same-sex marriage may very well be divorce attorneys.

--


Send feedback to the author.


The "What is the Deal?" column will appears weekly on the Pie of Knowledge website.  Guest submissions are welcome and encouraged.   To submit an article to "What is the Deal?" click here.

To subscribe to the "What is the Deal?" mailing list and receive early notification when a new column is available, click here.  The Pie of Knowledge will never, ever divulge email addresses to any third party for any reason unless so ordered by a court of law.

Contributions to the Pie of Knowledge are greatly appreciated.
I accept payment through PayPal!, the #1 online payment service!
Visitors:



The opinions expressed in "What is the Deal?" guest columns reflect those of the author only and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Pie of Knowledge.  The owner and staff of the Pie of Knowledge accept no responsibility for the content or accuracy of submitted commentary.  (c) Copyright 2002-2004 - The Pie of Knowledge (Jan A. Larson).  All rights reserved.  This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

[Top]